------- Comment #10 from spark at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-17 06:13 ------- I agree that the overeager has the worse worst-case bound. I'll happily approve a patch that drops overeager and leave double-queuing only, provided we have empirical data over some known programs to show that it is a compile time neutral change (I bet it will be so, or worst case, only a very slight slowdown).
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36365
