------- Comment #30 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-02-03 11:10 -------
With the patch in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2008-02/msg00006.html, the test
suite passed without new regression on ppc/intel darwin9, 32 and 64 bit modes.
As discussed on IRC, the test in comment #29 gives an error due to "source=t".
It would be more helpful to have the pointer under the second (not expected)
comma. However I don't think this should block the patch.
The test case gfortran.dg/host_assoc_variable_1.f90 is compile only. Would not
it be safer to make it "dg-do run" to rule out unexpected side effects in
future releases? If yes, the output should be checked by inserting something
like (regtested)
! { dg-output " *27(\n|\r\n|\r)" }
! { dg-output " *in the main: *27(\n|\r\n|\r)" }
! { dg-output " *35937(\n|\r\n|\r)" }
before
! { dg-final { cleanup-modules "gfcbug68 gfcbug68a m n" } }
Thanks for the patch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32760
