------- Comment #22 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-24 04:52
-------
Putting this back in fixes the new test case in comment #21
Index: primary.c
===================================================================
--- primary.c (revision 131752)
+++ primary.c (working copy)
@@ -2538,6 +2538,10 @@ match_variable (gfc_expr **result, int e
|| sym->attr.pointer || sym->as != NULL)
flavor = FL_VARIABLE;
+ if (sym->attr.access == ACCESS_PUBLIC
+ || sym->attr.access == ACCESS_PRIVATE)
+ break;
+
if (flavor != FL_UNKNOWN
&& gfc_add_flavor (&sym->attr, flavor, sym->name, NULL) == FAILURE)
return MATCH_ERROR;
Shall we go back to this? or just add it in as above? It does seem simpler and
more elegant and it makes sense. I am regression testing now.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32760
