At revision 131629 (trunk), the following code
type a_t
sequence
integer i
end type a_t
block data bd
common c
end block data bd
common /a_t/ c
end
gives
1234567.f90:6.13:
block data bd
1
Error: Unexpected BLOCK DATA statement at (1)
1234567.f90:7.10:
common c
1
Error: Unexpected COMMON statement at (1)
1234567.f90:8.3:
end block data bd
1
Error: Expecting END PROGRAM statement at (1)
1234567.f90:10.14:
common /a_t/ c
1
Error: Unexpected COMMON statement at (1)
f951: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
If I have identical copies named 1234567890a.f90 and 1234567890ab.f90, I have
the following behavior:
"gfc 1234567890a.f90" gives only the errors, but
"gfc -m64 gfc 1234567890a.f90" gives the errors + the ICE,
as well as "gfc 1234567890a.f90 -o tmp.o" , and
"gfc 1234567890ab.f90" with or without "-o tmp.o".
I have a similar behavior on powerpc-apple-darwin9.
The problem appeared between 'GNU Fortran (GCC) 4.3.0 20080115' (rev. 131542)
and '4.3.0 20080116' (rev. 131572). I don't see the problem on
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu rev. 131592 (Tobias Burnus' binaries).
--
Summary: [4.3 Regression] ICE on invalid depending of the length
of the source name
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
GCC build triplet: i686-apple-darwin9
GCC host triplet: i686-apple-darwin9
GCC target triplet: i686-apple-darwin9
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34858
