------- Comment #8 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-11 23:20 -------
Re: #7. Sorry about the timing. I agree it is unfortunate. I do believe that the correct timing on this is to do both new C++0x interfaces and the revised backwards includes at the same time. (Certainly, this fits in with the C++98 effort history and the last backward shuffling in 2001). All in all, I consider this a distinctly minor disturbance as compared to compiler changes like -fvisibility, anon namespaces, and 3.4's two-phase lookup change. That said, suggestions for improving the docs to help with this transition would be appreciated. -benjamin -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33831
