------- Comment #3 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-11 15:23 ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Isn't this what http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2007-09/msg00087.html (plus/minus a > few emails in the thread) is about?
Yes, you're right. > -fstrict-overflow > Allow the compiler to assume strict signed overflow rules, depending on the > language being compiled. Well, I think the "depending on the language being compiled" is important. I think the testcase is valid Fortran, and shouldn't fail whatever the optimization level you use. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33391
