------- Comment #8 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-11 15:58 ------- (In reply to comment #7) >> this behaviour was prohibited > > considering huge(0)+1 as invalid (out of range)
The second one, in the context of a loop index. But the more I think about it, the more dubious it seems, so I'll keep my mouth shut from now on. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33391
