------- Comment #23 from craig dot lawson at centrify dot com  2007-03-15 19:26 
-------
(In reply to comment #22)

> Oh yes, you are totally right. The problem is that <cerrno> is one of the very
> few c headers not including <bits/c++config.h> first. We can easily fix that.

Why did <cerrno> not include <bits/c++config.h>? Was this intentional?


> Ok, but on other targets I don't think we can trust locale.h to always include
> something similar and enable the thread safe errno.

I agree. They're all going to be different. But the evidence from basic_file.o
indicates that they all do something.


> Thus, my preference goes for the plan of adding that define in os_defines.h (+
> adjusting <cerrno> of course). Are you positive about figuring out something
> similar to _TS_ERRNO for the other targets?

Instead of _TS_ERRNO and equivalent, how about including <bits/c++config.h> in
<cerrno>? That appears sufficient for basic_file.o to be compiled correctly,
and it appears to work on the platforms I investigated.

What do you mean by "are you positive"?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31117

Reply via email to