------- Comment #25 from craig dot lawson at centrify dot com 2007-03-15 20:28 ------- (In reply to comment #24) > Oh, that's excellent news, because we have to include <bits/c++config.h> first > in <cerrno> anyway... But now you make me curious!!! If you look at > c++config.h > it doesn't appear do much related to this issue....
Sorry, that news was too excellent. It's not true. The reason I suggested also including <clocale> in comment #10 was because I found <bits/c++config.h> was not enough. I agree that <clocale> is perhaps a poor choice. I think it needs further investigation as to what would be a good choice. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31117
