------- Comment #4 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-03-11 23:48 ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Don't like to name people, but I suppose this patch should be reverted:
Please, please, don't do that! Instead, let's solve the real issue with the tree-codes limit once and for all, because sooner or later we have to do that anyway (as Rth, among others, also maintained time ago, in the occasion of the GOMP additions) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31134
