------- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-03-12 05:05 -------
Even though Objective-C++ is not a release blocker, it would be nice for all of
the C++ patches to test with objective-C++ on and really that should be a
requirement.  I rather see Objective-C++ working than C++0x.  The features that
C++0x give are not as good as the features give by Objective-C++ in my mind.  

Though the objective-C++ can reduce the number of tree codes it uses, the
number will only be by like 2-3.  Objective-C++ uses only 10 extra tree codes
about C++ so really C++ is going to hit the limit soon if we are not careful
anyways.

Also adding new features should not break old features so Doug in my mind you
should revert your patch in 48 hours if you cannot fix it by then, I requesting
this as the GNU libobjc maintainer.


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|normal                      |blocker


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31134

Reply via email to