------- Comment #12 from felix-gcc at fefe dot de 2007-01-17 15:21 -------
(In reply to comment #11)
> Btw. your testcase "fails" with gcc 2.95.3 for me as well, so no news here.
>
Bullshit.
$ ./gcc2 -v
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/2.95.3/specs
gcc version 2.95.3 20010315 (release)
$ ./gcc2 -o int int.c
200 100
int: int.c:4: foo: Assertion `a+100 > a' failed.
$
Why don't you get your facts straight. My gcc is the stock gcc 2.95.3, your's
is apparently some butchered distro version.
You know, the more apologists for the current behavior come forward, the less
credible your position looks.
--
felix-gcc at fefe dot de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30475
