------- Comment #7 from gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2007-01-02 23:33 ------- Subject: Re: Failure to diagnose overflow in constant expression
"andrew dot stubbs at st dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | ------- Comment #6 from andrew dot stubbs at st dot com 2007-01-02 14:04 ------- | (In reply to comment #5) | > Why is this "accepts-invalid"? Shouldn't it be "diagnostic" instead? I am | > trying to understand what is the expected output here: a warning or a pedantic | > error? | | Clause 5 paragraph 5 says it is "ill-formed". Therefore accepts-invalid sounds | right to me. In C++, "ill-formed" implies "diagnostic is required" unless explicitly noted otherwise. -- Gaby -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28986
