------- Comment #6 from andrew dot stubbs at st dot com 2007-01-02 14:04 ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Why is this "accepts-invalid"? Shouldn't it be "diagnostic" instead? I am > trying to understand what is the expected output here: a warning or a pedantic > error?
Clause 5 paragraph 5 says it is "ill-formed". Therefore accepts-invalid sounds right to me. In pedantic mode this should definitely be an error in my opinion. What it should do otherwise is not clear to me. It seems sensible to accept it with -fpermissive. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28986
