------- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-13 02:37 ------- (In reply to comment #3) > This problem was introduced by this change: That makes less sense really, because this just changes how to deal with TREE_NOTHROW. This sounds like a latent bug really.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29487
