------- Comment #7 from iano at apple dot com 2006-08-22 00:39 ------- Subject: Re: __builtin_nan() and __builtin_unordered() inconsistent
On Aug 21, 2006, at 5:34 PM, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > > > ------- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-22 > 00:34 ------- > (In reply to comment #5) >> My first complaint is that the implementation is inconsistent. > > It is not inconsistent really. Just the -funsafe-math- > optimizations is done > incorrectly for x86 (see the other bug which I keep on mentioning > over and over > again). Which part of: __builtin_isunordered(nan,nan) = 1 __builtin_isnan(nan) = 0 is consistent? [ollmia:/tmp] iano% gcc main3.c -Wall -ffinite-math-only; ./a.out -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28796
