------- Comment #2 from erik dot edelmann at iki dot fi 2006-08-09 10:54 ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Actually this is worse than what is said here, this is wrong code. In a > prerelease of 4.1.0, we allocate r after we allocate x so the size of x is not > know at the time we allocate r.
Ah, that explains the cray results I'm getting from my program! -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28660