------- Comment #6 from paul dot richard dot thomas at cea dot fr  2006-08-11 
14:08 -------
Created an attachment (id=12066)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12066&action=view)
Prototype fix

The attached runs the testcase below correctly and regtests, except for 
gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/entry_5.f90, on Cygwin_NT/PIV.

I have not had enough time to really check with it is necessary and sufficient,
to fix this one regression nor have I had time to track down the cause of an
irritating but apparently harmless wrinkle - the declaration char z[1:.z]
appears twice; the first time with an incorrect .z and the second with the
correct value for .z.  Fortunately, it is the second declaration that is seen
in the scope of the executable code.

As of tomorrow, I am back on the road again until the end of next week.  If you
want to run with this, please do.  Otherwise, I will complete the job upon my
return.

All the best

Paul

PS I have made some progress on allocatable component derived type
constructors.

PPS This works with the patch:

program runoptf90
    implicit none
    real :: x(10)
    call simulated_annealing1 (x)
    call simulated_annealing2 (x)
    call simulated_annealing3 (x)
contains
    subroutine simulated_annealing1 (xmin)
        real, intent(inout) :: xmin(:)
        real :: x(size(xmin)+1)
        real :: r(size(x)-2)
        xmin = r
        print *, "#1 ", size(r), size(x)
    end subroutine simulated_annealing1
    subroutine simulated_annealing2 (xmin)
        real, intent(inout) :: xmin(:)
        real :: x(size(xmin)+3)
        real :: zr(size(x)-6)
        xmin = zr
        print *, "#2 ", size(zr), size(x)
    end subroutine simulated_annealing2
    subroutine simulated_annealing3 (xmin)
        real, intent(inout) :: xmin(:)
        character(size(x)+2) :: y         ! host associated x
        character(len(y)+3) :: z
        real :: r(len(z)-10)
        xmin = r
        print *, "#3 ", size(r), len(z)
    end subroutine simulated_annealing3
end program runoptf90


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28660

Reply via email to