------- Comment #8 from joern dot rennecke at st dot com 2006-07-25 17:08 ------- Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] MIssing debug info at -O0 for a local variable in a C++ constructor
drow at false dot org wrote: >------- Comment #7 from drow at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-25 13:27 ------- >Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] MIssing debug info at -O0 for a local variable >in a C++ constructor > >On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 12:14:46PM -0000, amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > > >>If this is fixed on mainline, the fix must be rather recent; I see this still >>failing with >>r115417: GNU C++ version 4.2.0 20060713 (experimental). >>What is the oldest gcc 4.2 version where you saw this work? >> >> > >I tested it on HEAD on the day I posted (2006-07-22). Could you check >whether that works for you, or it's something environmental? > > When I compile the testcase (using -g -O0) with a cc1plus built from todays sources (r115734), a test search for "problem" in the .s file comes up empty. OTOH, both a native and a cross build eventually failed. Can you find out the exact version of gcc that you tested? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27574
