http://en.fon.com/ On 15 Jul 2006 16:25:10 -0000 "ams at gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > ------- Comment #11 from ams at gnu dot org 2006-07-15 16:25 ------- > Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' > undeclared > > > Can you please just apply the patch and close the bug? > > Why it is not obvious and I say the patch is incorrect. > > The patch is correct, that you think that the code we use from > */linux.h should be in */gnu.h is not related to this bug. This is > the setup we have used for almost 10 years, and I see no reason to > change it. The setup works, it minimises the workload on both > parties, and it is clean. > > If you don't want to commit the patch then that is fine, it isn't like > GCC can even compile on the GNU system due to the other bugs with > patches being neglected (mostly by me). > > Happy hacking. > > > -- > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28102 >
