------- Comment #31 from gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu 2006-01-12 01:15 ------- Subject: Re: exception_defines.h #defines try/catch
"hhinnant at apple dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] | I'm simply pointing out that the effort could be improved. | Obviously no standard is going to back this view up. Great. Then stopping making conformance claims. Also consider the suggestion made earlier that the root of the problem is elsewhere -- extend the front-end to be complete. | We have a conforming C++ program, which does not use try/catch/throw, it uses the identifier "try". | which | works as expected under -fno-exceptions if you don't include <vector>, and | breaks if you do. I think libstdc++ can and should do better than that. We | have customer complaints on this issue. I'm developing a library-based patch | to improve our support in this area. given than bkoz and I have already expressed our suggestion of no further uglification of libstdc++, I'm waiting to see how the library-based patch would look like. -- Gaby -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25191
