------- Comment #28 from gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu 2006-01-12 00:12 ------- Subject: Re: exception_defines.h #defines try/catch
"hhinnant at apple dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | ------- Comment #26 from hhinnant at apple dot com 2006-01-11 18:02 ------- | (In reply to comment #25) | > Subject: Re: exception_defines.h #defines try/catch | > | The demo program does not play tricks with try/catch. | > | > It does, with xlgue(try, ....). | | No, "try" in this context is not a keyword. I did not say it was a keyword. I know what it is in that phase. try/catch are special when -fno-exceptions. [...] | > Can you provide standard specs that says the program must work with | > -fno-exceptions? | | Of course not. Then stop claiming that your use was conformant. [...] | I would rather not document that the libstdc++ takes a position | contrary to the compiler It does not take a position contrary to the compiler. It complements the compiler, with its own additional requirement. That is not new. -- Gaby -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25191
