------- Comment #13 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-23 23:40
-------
I've finally figured out a tractable solution to this problem: just treat these
as dynamic initializations. That will be slightly less efficient than what the
C front end does, and result in a different initialization order, but so be it.
Testing a patch now.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |mark at codesourcery dot com
|dot org |
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23171
