------- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-12-07 22:26 -------
Related to PR 16505.  This is the same issue as PR 16505.

Can someone close to the standard answer the question why did they change the
return type for these functions?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25304

Reply via email to