------- Comment #7 from krebbel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-07 16:26 -------
Created an attachment (id=10435)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10435&action=view)
Patch without testcase
I've bootstrapped the attached patch on s390 and s390x without
testsuite regressions.
The patch matches almost exactly what you did. Additionally
I've merged the predicates setmem_operand and shift_count_operand
because after that change they contain the same code.
And the setmem_long pattern should as well be duplicated checking
for a mask of 255.
As testcase I think the smaller testcase I posted would be preferable.
--
krebbel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |krebbel at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25268
