------- Comment #9 from krebbel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-07 17:33 ------- (In reply to comment #8) > Ok (not sure if it really is a good idea to make the *_operand names that > long), Mmmh you are right but I couldn't think of a better name that moment.
just I'm afraid ashrdi3_cc_64_and, ashrdi3_cc_31_and and ashrsi3_cc_and > will never match in your patch, because you haven't replaced (match_dup 2) > with (and:SI (match_dup 2) (match_dup 3)). Oops. Right - thanks for fixing this. > Attaching updated version of your patch with this and testcase incorporated. Thanks I've posted your updated version on gcc-patches and added your name to the changelog entry. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25268
