------- Comment #9 from amodra at bigpond dot net dot au  2005-11-24 08:59 
-------
Indeed it's not a stack slot.  Instead, reg 1824 is an invariant, equal to
sfp+16512.  Code in reload1.c:eliminate_regs_1 substitutes r1 for sfp, then
reorganises the order of the additions, so we get (r1+r11)+const not
(r1+const)+r11.  This of course isn't a valid address on powerpc, where indexed
addresses can't take an offset.

In case it isn't obvious, I'm a little lost.  Hopefully my analysis will let
someone more familiar with reload sort this out.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24997

Reply via email to