------- Comment #21 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-10-20 12:14 
-------
Subject: Bug 23585

CVSROOT:        /cvs/gcc
Module name:    gcc
Changes by:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]   2005-10-20 12:14:30

Modified files:
        gcc            : ChangeLog function.c reorg.c rtl.h rtlanal.c 
        gcc/config/sparc: sparc.h 
        gcc/testsuite  : ChangeLog 
Added files:
        gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/opt: delay-slot-1.C 

Log message:
        PR rtl-optimization/23585
        * rtlanal.c (rtx_addr_can_trap_p_1): New predicate extracted from...
        (rtx_addr_can_trap_p): ... here.  Invoke rtx_addr_can_trap_p_1.
        (may_trap_p_1): New predicate extracted from...
        (may_trap_p): ... here.  Invoke may_trap_p_1.
        (may_trap_or_fault_p): New predicate.
        * rtl.h (may_trap_or_fault_p): Declare it.
        * reorg.c (steal_delay_list_from_target): Use may_trap_or_fault_p
        instead of may_trap_p.
        (steal_delay_list_from_fallthrough): Likewise.
        (fill_simple_delay_slots): Likewise.
        (fill_slots_from_thread): Likewise.
        * function.c (pad_to_arg_alignment): Rework comment about
        SPARC_STACK_BOUNDARY_HACK.
        * config/sparc/sparc.h: Likewise.

Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=2.10191&r2=2.10192
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/function.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.646&r2=1.647
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/reorg.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.111&r2=1.112
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/rtl.h.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.560&r2=1.561
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/rtlanal.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.220&r2=1.221
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/config/sparc/sparc.h.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.290&r2=1.291
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.6216&r2=1.6217
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/opt/delay-slot-1.C.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=NONE&r2=1.1


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23585

Reply via email to