------- Additional Comments From adah at netstd dot com 2005-08-09 13:26 ------- (In reply to comment #63) > | Do *you* like it? > It is immaterial as far as GCC is concerned. I know where to raise
Why immaterial? I just cannot imagine anybody that *likes* this behaviour. If no one likes it, how can you call it reasonable behaviour (just because a C++ god nodded)? If it is not reasonable behaviour, why can't you accept that it is a bug? By the way, I think a `bug' here can really be a design flaw, or an enhancement request. > such issues and I've suggested you do the same. You seem not to > understand that comp.lang.c++.moderated and comp.std.c++ are the I posted about one day ago on comp.std.c++. No one answered. I do not know any better way to contact anybody that might be in the committee. > appropriate places. Insisting here will not help you. At this point, Reproaching me in this way won't help you, either. I repeat one thing: I do not have the OP's problem. As a programmer that has some familiarity with the language and the Standard, it is hard to encounter this kind of problems. --- People that encounter this bug most probably know little (if any) of the C++ Standard, and people know well about the Standard most probably won't encounter this bug at all. --- This fact strengthens my point that it is a bug. > the only thing you're doing here is sabotaging your own cause by > frustrating people, who otherwise might be disposed to listen to and If you had not spoken in this kind of tones, I might have been much more considerate and constructive. However, I have already tried to be calm and constructive instead of being flamy. I just cannot understand why you have never shown any patience and sympathy on this issue. > support you. If that was your original purpose, then you have > partially succeeded. > -- Gaby Yongwei -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15910
