------- Additional Comments From adah at netstd dot com 2005-08-09 10:49 ------- (In reply to comment #61) > Subject: Re: can't compile self defined void distance(std::vector<T>, std::vector<T>) > "adah at netstd dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | ------- Additional Comments From adah at netstd dot com 2005-08-09 01:45 -- ----- > | (In reply to comment #59) > | > Subject: Re: can't compile self defined void distance(std::vector<T>, > | std::vector<T>) > | > "adah at netstd dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | > | Does a compiler serve its users or the Standard committee? > | > Answer: Does a compiler that does not implement the standard specification > | > serves its users? > | > -- Gaby > | > | Answer to answer: Does a compiler that implement a wrong specification in the > | Standard serves the users? > The core issue is how do you determine that a standard specification > is wrong? Just because *you* don't like it? Sorry, that is insufficient.
Do *you* like it? If you like it, then I suppose you like to frustrate GCC users? > There is a well-known body and a well-known process to handle that. > Please take it to the C++ standard committee. Common users are not supposed to talk with the standard committee. They may even not know it. I have stated it clearly enough. > | I am not requiring that GCC must fix the bug > Bugzilla is about bugs in GCC. If you think it is not a bug, then you I do think it is a bug (also clear enough, as I still call it a `bug'). Even though it might be due to a bug in the Standard. > must take it to the place where they handle perceived bugs in the standard. > -- Gaby Yongwei -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15910
