> Do you still need such a test font with SVG and COLR in it? I guess,
> we can make one if it's needed.
This would be still very helpful, yes. I think it would be helpful
for for fuzzing, too. A single glyph (besides '.notdef) would be
enough.
>> The question doesn't arise for serious `COLR` handling, as
>> described above. In case of the convenience `COLR` rendering,
>> `SVG` takes precendence.
>
> I think the table preference decision should be made by the
> application, or in the FT_LoadGlyph then with flags that allow
> separate selection?
Since the convenience stuff is tagged as experimental, and Alexei has
some serious concerns I probably won't change anything right now.
> FWIW, overall, I think if a font has COLRv1 and SVG, COLRv1 should
> have preference as it enables variable capabilities.
This is up to the application; there is no issue w.r.t. precendence at
all.
Werner
