> IMO if “docwriter” is only used by freetype and for freetype there is no > reason to publish it on PyPI, which is more meant for reusable libraries as > opposed to applications. >
Well, this is open for discussion, because I don't think all of the more than 140,000 packages on pip are reusable. > Also docwriter is a quite generic name for a python package or for a > script, it may well clash with other published current or future projects. > This is true, it might clash with the name of a reusable future project. I was toying with the idea of making docwriter more reusable for other projects too, after the GSoC period, of course. -- Nikhil
_______________________________________________ Freetype-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
