Hallo Herr Jim Hall,
>> >> How (also when) will this patch (and other patches) make it into the >> >> official freecom repo? >> >> I have no idea about if, where and when. >> >> Maybe ask the project coordinator? >> > We'll get it in there. >> >> The kernel is *the* core component of an OS. Therefore, it should be >> >> made clear, where official development takes place. >> >> > https://github.com/PerditionC/fdkernel clearly says: >> > "!!! This fork is no longer the primary fork -- Please post PRs and >> > issues to https://github.com/FDOS/kernel !!!" >> >> > So, https://gitlab.com/FreeDOS/base/kernel#still-actively-developed >> > should be updated accordingly. >> >> +1 >> >> for some reason Perdition is in charge > That's a cynical Yes. Absolutely. > and disingenuous statement. no. not at all: > Development happens all > over, and some folks prefer using different tools. Perdition set up > his kernel repo in GitHub because that was his tool. And he did that > before we set up the GitLab repo for FreeDOS (gitlab.com/freedos) so > the kernel isn't in there. it's one thing to have your personal choice of tools, no problem at all with that. we used to have " <[email protected]> as the 'central market place" to discuss needed bug fixes. > I think we should merge the kernel back into the new FreeDOS GitLab > repo, now that we have one. WOW. DEEP I SIDES BY THE PROJECT LEADER. > But that's a separate discussion I'll start with Perdition. of course you can point us to a seperate discussion why you and perdition are the relevant people to have this discussion. Tom _______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
