On Sat, 1 May 2021, Jim Hall wrote:
Using "2.02.01" is an interesting solution, but then the "version
number" on the filename no longer matches what's in the documentation
- or reported by the program when you run it. If the program outputs a
version number that's "2.1" (and uses "2.1" in the documentation) and
we rename the file to "2.01" .. that will confuse people too.
I call it "Tandy numbering", since that's how Tandy used to do version
numbering.
There is no 100% perfect solution. :-(
Too true.
Would've been nice to standardize on a specific method of numbering but
it's about 27 years too late for that. ;)
-uso.
_______________________________________________
Freedos-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
