> The biggest problem that I see with/for FreeDOS is the number of
> people actually still interested in working with/for (Free)DOS. That
> number has always been limited, but has gotten even smaller over the
> years. Beside Jim, who started this, I might actually now be the
> longest surviving member here, being more or less active since late
> '95 or early '96. A lot of people from the early years have come and
> gone, for various reasons. But what has become a slow but seemingly
> steady stream is that there are new people showing up once in a
> while, with a whole plethora of grand ideas, that very quickly end
> up nowhere. As it seems, mostly because the vast majority of those
> doesn't understand what DOS is. And that seems to be part of the
> overall trend, where people are coming up with solutions for issues
> that people pretend to have  in order to solve problems that nobody
> has...



+1


In general, I like the idea of extending DOS. That's what FreeDOS is
about. But FreeDOS is still DOS, and that means all the limitations
that come with it.


Jim


_______________________________________________
Freedos-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel

Reply via email to