Hello,

2011/7/10 Eric Auer <[email protected]>:
>
> Hi Aitor,
>
>>>>> It still needs a lot of unnecessary UMB room free to load there, e.g.
>>>>> 64 kb or some fairly high amount. And you may even have to explicitly
>>>>> mention it. I forget exactly and always (I think) loaded it low. Well,
>>>>> I'd have to check ....
>>>>
>>>> If only I could assume that there's ALWAYS XMS ;)))
>>>
>>> As far as I remember, the main problem was that you did not want
>>> to require DOS 4.0 or newer and therefore first allocated MANY
>>> buffers, then reducing them. With DOS 4.0 or newer, can simply
>>> check at run-time whether the user-selected amount of buffers
>>> will fit into the available memory, even for device drivers :-)
>>
>> You remember wrong.
>> It's simply that if the reallocate call fails, DISPLAY won't load at
>> all, and that is not desirable.
>
> At the moment, DISPLAY will fail to load into any normal-sized UMB
> which means people will avoid using DISPLAY at all, which is even
> less desirable than a failure to load it when you try to load it
> into a too small USB. In the latter case, you can still reduce the

We all understood in the firs place.

> number of buffers or make a bit more space to load DISPLAY into an
> blah, blah

as I said, I'm tired of talking about this with you again and again and again...

> That said, a possible fallback could be to allocate low memory ONLY
> if the reallocation call fails. Then you neither have to start with
> huge initial heap nor have to abort loading either.

That is what LOADHIGH is supposed to do.

Aitor

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security 
threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes 
sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
_______________________________________________
Freedos-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel

Reply via email to