No, I made optimizations. And btw, the LFN stuff I was just talking about was compiled in the 'full' 186+ version. The optimizations I made made FreeCOM about 2 kb smaller when compiled with -1; which it seems was enought to compile more features into a 8086 XMS Swap version... like CMD_LH :-).
On 6/7/06, Kenneth J. Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Blair Campbell wrote: > > > But the question is: Will anyone help me test it :-) (Preferrably > > both versions) > > Also note that chdir, rmdir, and mkdir support LFNs properly, and DIR > > /LFN will print long filenames for all files with lfn entries, just as > > MS-DOS 7's command.com does. > ... > > So what LFN support was cut? > Anyway, assuming you just compiled changing the included features > defined then it should be no more or less stable [ie there is something > funky in 0.84pre with non-english that I just never had the time to > track down] and sounds like you made a better compromise than I > selected. :-) > > Jeremy > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Freedos-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel > -- Fall is my favorite season in Los Angeles, watching the birds change color and fall from the trees. David Letterman (1947 - ) See ya _______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
