To clear things up, this FreeCOM is really only about 1 kb larger than the 186+ one... and 386-optimized is _not_ possible because the only compiler that can compile it only does up to 286+, which turns out to produce the exact same code as 186+. And it also turns out that no 'split' is necessary because both versions are compiled with the same code, just different definitions set in config.h. And FreeCOM (both versions) are about as big as they can possibly get without the linker complaining about them being way too big.
:-) On 6/7/06, Johnson Lam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 7 Jun 2006 21:40:59 -0400 (EDT), you wrote: > > >It is a feature I would support, having a single FreeCOM on all systems. > >Would especially be useful for my boot disks. > > It's good to have a single FreeCOM that support everything, but it's > size will be big since everything put inside. > > I think split the branch to "universal" and "386 optimized" will be > better. > > > Rgds, > Johnson. > > > _______________________________________________ > Freedos-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel > -- Fall is my favorite season in Los Angeles, watching the birds change color and fall from the trees. David Letterman (1947 - ) See ya _______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
