Hi!
16-Мар-2005 10:00 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (AITOR SANTAMARIA MERINO) wrote to
[email protected]:
>>ASM> (2) I don't think MS-DOS 5.0 is an improvement over 3.3, even
>> It is: HMA and UMB, config menus, new/documented APIs (and
ASM> Ok, let me re-phrase: of course it is based on 3.30,
Same, as Linux "based" on Unix or WinXP "based" on Win9x.
ASM> but I think it goes much further than that:
Contraditcion: "don't think is an improvement" or "goes much further"?
ASM> improved memory management,
"Improved"? DOS' memory management is too dumb to improve it. Or, you
mean additions in MM for UMB and HMA?
ASM> and response to WIN386 broadcast messages are just two examples.
>>ASM> (4) The necessity to comply with RBIL was questioned in this list time
>>ago
>> And?
ASM> Just to mention some.
? You mean: "spec should mention RBIL as reference source"?
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Freedos-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
