On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 10:55:57 +0300, you wrote: Hi Lucho,
I'm trying to be moderate. I didn't like anger or quarrels. I enjoy reading the mailing list, picking out the bugs and learning more from all of you. IMO we should be happy and fun working together. >And what have we achieved? An eagle, cancer, and pike (like in the >Krylov's fable ;-) Neither insist doing this or that, if the option is USEFUL and NECESSARY, (in this EMM386 case) why not just compile the 2 switch in, and follow the most compatible standard? >There is NO WAY to avoid this. The more you satisfy them, the more they >complain :-( I agree. Depends on the "education level" of the user, you can't listen to them everytime but you can't listen none, only filter out the reasonable request, it's like SPAM email ... waste of time and tired but it's the best way. >> Moral: what you think it's a waste of time, may not be for others. :) >This is true ;-) And I think we should be more objective on the FreeDOS. Tom once said: "Just compile and shut up". IMO it's a bit rude (sorry Tom) but I like his style, put more effort on work instead of arguing, just send out the program and let the user decide "what to do next". Rgds, Johnson. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed the changes on Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the past few weeks? Now, one more big change to announce. We are now OSTG- Open Source Technology Group. Come see the changes on the new OSTG site. www.ostg.com _______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
