Le lun. 26 oct. 26 à 12:44:22 +0100, Daniel Engberg <[email protected]> écrivait :
> > > > x11/budgie: Remove from tree > > > > Broken for more than 5 months in tree without any PRs submitted > > > > Removes Budgie desktop and related ports > > > > > > > > > I'd like to strongly express that I think this is not a proper way to > > > manage the FreeBSD port tree in this case (especially in this case, not > > > only though...). > > > > > > To my understanding there's the BROKEN flag available in the ports > > > framework, which perfectly matches here and should have been set as a > > > first measure. > > > > You are correct. It should not have been removed the way it was. > > > > It should be put back and marked BROKEN. > > > > > If for some unknown reason removing other's work makes live easier for > > > ports tree people@freeebsd, mark it for removal (deprecate) at the same > > > time, before nuking this port. > > > > Agreed. > > > > According to what? According to common sense and the respect of the users. No need of a written policy fot that. -- Th. Thomas.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
