On 2026-10-26 12:41, Dan Langille wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2026, at 05:07, Harry Schmalzbauer wrote:
he branch main has been updated by diizzy:
URL:https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/ports/commit/?
id=6ea8a98a6540238635dd56b9ebecf3f3bacdeed6
commit 6ea8a98a6540238635dd56b9ebecf3f3bacdeed6
Author: Daniel Engberg<[email protected]>
AuthorDate: 2026-10-26 05:40:44 +0000
Commit: Daniel Engberg<[email protected]>
CommitDate: 2026-10-26 06:34:32 +0000
x11/budgie: Remove from tree
Broken for more than 5 months in tree without any PRs submitted
Removes Budgie desktop and related ports
I'd like to strongly express that I think this is not a proper way to
manage the FreeBSD port tree in this case (especially in this case, not
only though...).
To my understanding there's the BROKEN flag available in the ports
framework, which perfectly matches here and should have been set as a
first measure.
You are correct. It should not have been removed the way it was.
It should be put back and marked BROKEN.
If for some unknown reason removing other's work makes live easier for
ports tree people@freeebsd, mark it for removal (deprecate) at the same
time, before nuking this port.
Agreed.
According to what?
Best regards,
Daniel
