On 4/03/2015 9:00 PM, Doug Hardie wrote: > >> On 3 March 2015, at 22:45, Kubilay Kocak <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> Canonically and preferred: >> >> Set maintainer-approval flag to + *on the attachment/patch*. >> >> The maintainer-feedback flag is at the issue/bug scope, not the >> attachment/patch scope. >> >> This of course requires the maintainer-approval flag was set to ? with >> your email as the value first. >> >> Currently this is not automatic, but *should be* if there is an >> attachment of type: patch in the issue. I'll create an issue for that >> now for bugmeister@ to look into addressing. >> >> Only in cases where maintainer-approval is *not* already set to"?", is >> using the maintainer-feedback flag + comment flow OK. >> >> Setting maintainer-feedback is ambiguous, and is used to prove >> 'acknowledgement' of an issue or question. >> >> This is especially the case when there are multiple version of patches, >> or patches from multiple contributors. In future it will be used to >> derive "maintainer timeouts" to kick issues along, and open them up for >> someone else to make a decision on. >> >> tldr; Set the maintainer-approval flag to + >> > > Thanks to all who replied. I found and set the maintainer-feedback flag at > the issue/bug scope. I couldn’t find any similar flag at the > attachment/patch scope. Nothing there was really applicable. >
Which issue? _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
