> On 3 March 2015, at 22:45, Kubilay Kocak <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Canonically and preferred: > > Set maintainer-approval flag to + *on the attachment/patch*. > > The maintainer-feedback flag is at the issue/bug scope, not the > attachment/patch scope. > > This of course requires the maintainer-approval flag was set to ? with > your email as the value first. > > Currently this is not automatic, but *should be* if there is an > attachment of type: patch in the issue. I'll create an issue for that > now for bugmeister@ to look into addressing. > > Only in cases where maintainer-approval is *not* already set to"?", is > using the maintainer-feedback flag + comment flow OK. > > Setting maintainer-feedback is ambiguous, and is used to prove > 'acknowledgement' of an issue or question. > > This is especially the case when there are multiple version of patches, > or patches from multiple contributors. In future it will be used to > derive "maintainer timeouts" to kick issues along, and open them up for > someone else to make a decision on. > > tldr; Set the maintainer-approval flag to + >
Thanks to all who replied. I found and set the maintainer-feedback flag at the issue/bug scope. I couldn’t find any similar flag at the attachment/patch scope. Nothing there was really applicable. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
