Big Lebowski <[email protected]> writes: > Yes, that was exactly the case - I know about these options, and I know how > to use them, but somehow RUN_DEPENDS doesnt feel right here. The original > port is a standalone piece of software, that can perfectly run without the > second one. The second one happens to be developed very closely with first > one, and its a commandline tool for it (but there are other ways to access > and work on the original port). Therefore RUN_DEPENDS sounds wrong. > But if that's what should be used, I'll do so.
Look at it this way; the *option* depends on the second port. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
