On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Lowell Gilbert < [email protected]> wrote:
> Torfinn Ingolfsen <[email protected]> writes: > > > On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 7:58 PM, Big Lebowski <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> Just bumping it in a hope of someone actually knowing the answer... > > > > Look at one of the existing meta-ports to see how it is done. > > For example: /usr/ports/x11-wm/xfce4 > > My reading of the original message is that the poster knew about > RUN_DEPENDS and OPTIONS, but wasn't comfortable combining the two > for reasons that weren't really clear. Nonetheless, I'm pretty > sure that is what he should do. Yes, that was exactly the case - I know about these options, and I know how to use them, but somehow RUN_DEPENDS doesnt feel right here. The original port is a standalone piece of software, that can perfectly run without the second one. The second one happens to be developed very closely with first one, and its a commandline tool for it (but there are other ways to access and work on the original port). Therefore RUN_DEPENDS sounds wrong. But if that's what should be used, I'll do so. Thanks everyone! _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
