Brooks Davis píše v po 05. 12. 2011 v 10:15 -0600: > On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 01:28:33AM -0600, Mark Linimon wrote: > > I would like to hold off on any more disruptive changes to the tree > > until we can get this release out the door. If that means devel/clang > > needs to stay at its current value (and only clang-devel updated), then > > that's fine. > > We don't actually need to add a bsd.pure.mk to upgrade llvm. We would > need to complete the repocopy in ports/163030 and change the build and > run depends in lang/pure which would change the depends of the 12ish > ports involved. Similar changes are needed in a couple other ports. > > I'll leave it up to portmgr to decide if that's too disruptive. IMO if > any change of this scope (an upgrade triggering less than dozen rebuilds, > mostly of ports that aren't widely used) should be approved, it should > be this one given our general toolchain focus.
Just put it under /usr/ports/lang/pure/bsd.pure.mk and be done with it. We can always move it to /usr/ports/Mk later. -- -- Pav Lucistnik <[email protected]> <[email protected]> God is real unless declared integer.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
