On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 13:02:38 -0600
Zhihao Yuan <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> The PR which updates all pure-* ports was passed to portmgr for a long
> time, since it seem that to put a
> 
> .if defined(USE_PURE)
> .include "${PORTSDIR}/Mk/bsd.pure.mk"
> .endif
> 
> In bsd.port.mk may a be better choice. Though Pure is not as popular
> as some languages like PHP or Python, but it does and it will have
> more ports than like Go. To include bsd.pure.mk under Mk/ can lower 2
> lines in ~20 ports (or I have to leave it under lang/pure's private
> directory).

How many pure ports are there ATM?

-- 
IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
  "Intellectual Property" is   nowhere near as valuable   as "Intellect"
FreeBSD committer -> [email protected], PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to