On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 09:11:29AM -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > two independent efforts (ATF & bmake) and there was no indication that > one would be greatly benefitted from the other. At least not to the > point of creating a dependency.
It seems we do have the situation where folks feel there is a dependency between the two. > Before we can switch permanently to bmake, we need to do the following > first: > 1. Request an EXP ports build with bmake as make(1). This should tell > us the "damage" of switching to bmake for ports. > 2. In parallel with 1: build www & docs with bmake and assess the > damage > 3. Fix all the damage > > It could be a while (many weeks) before we get to 4, so the question Given the time this will take, I feel we need to add another knob to the Bmake build so that 'make world' gives one both the FreeBSD make as /usr/bin/make and Bmake as /usr/bin/bmake. thoughts, -- -- David ([email protected]) _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
