On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 9:29 AM, David Wolfskill <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 12:11:21PM -0400, George Neville-Neil wrote:
>> ...
>> But, I would like to drive this to a solution on arch@. We don't have an
>> atf@, but we do have a test@ and testing@. We have too many mailing
>> lists already, so let's finish this up here if we can and then
>> continue talking on testing@.
>> ...
>
> Before folks get too excited about test@ & testing@:
>
> * test@ is for testing ability to send mail to FreeBSD.org (mailing
> lists).
>
> * testing@ *used* to exist, but was retired for lack of relevant
> traffic.
>
> * There's little difference in effort in resurrecting testing@ vs.
> creating atf@.
I think that resurrecting testing@ makes more sense as creating an
atf specific list seems a bit too focused on ATF, primarily because
atf is being "partially superseded" by kyua (pronounced Q-A) in the
near future.
Thanks!
-Garrett
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
